Teams

Archer/META

2026 Combo 65 & over- META · 7.5 Combo Super Senior Women

10 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 7.5 Combo Super Senior Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Archer/META000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Emily Caveney
published
3.72
Jacquelyn Wondergem
published
3.60
Janet Mitchell
published
3.59
Marcia Sentell
published
3.52
Gail Archer
published
3.45
Theresa Boyd
published
3.40
Donna Morris
published
3.35
Donna Wilkinson
published
Myra O'Dell
published
Patricia Rowland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Archer + Donna Wilkinson213 matchesnot enough data
Gail Archer + Marcia Sentell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Caveney
21W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
Jacquelyn Wondergem
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Janet Mitchell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Marcia Sentell
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
Gail Archer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Theresa Boyd
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Donna Morris
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Donna Wilkinson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Myra O'Dell
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Rowland
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.