Teams

LS:65& 7.0:Pavelcak

2022 ECT Adult 65 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-16vs LS:Senior Storm:WenckLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Philippa Mannino vs Kathleen Kenyon / Colleen Sullivan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSheryl Ash / Kim de Matteo vs Barbara Pilcher / Leah Ward2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Passarello / Karen Ulrich vs Debra Drakos / Starr Furlotte7-6, 6-2
2022-06-09vs LS:Senior Storm:WenckLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Kathleen Caldarella vs Kathleen Kenyon / Colleen Sullivan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Caldwell / Kim de Matteo vs Karen Eller / Barbara Pilcher1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Passarello / Hollis Ridgway vs Judy Tabar / Suzanne Mc Auliffe7-5, 6-2
2022-06-02vs LS:Senior Storm:WenckWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Mary Ann Moran vs Leah Ward / Starr Furlotte6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Hollis Ridgway vs Suzanne Mc Auliffe / Debra Drakos6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Pavelcak / Kathleen Caldarella vs Marabeth Clapp / Kathleen Kenyon6-2, 6-0
2022-05-26vs LS:Senior Storm:WenckLost 12
W#1 DoublesDennise Antonio / Kathy Pavelcak vs Virginia Jordan / Karen Eller6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Caldwell / Hollis Ridgway vs Leah Ward / Marian Wenck2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJo-Ann Staves / Karen Ulrich vs Suzanne Mc Auliffe / Susan Kocielo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-17vs LS:Senior Storm:WenckLost 12
W#1 DoublesPhilippa Mannino / Mary Ann Moran vs Karen Eller / Barbara Pilcher5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheryl Ash / Kim de Matteo vs Suzanne Mc Auliffe / Susan Kocielo4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Jo-Ann Staves vs Leah Ward / Marian Wenck4-6, 4-6
2022-05-12vs LS:Senior Storm:WenckLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Caldwell / Philippa Mannino vs Suzanne Mc Auliffe / Judy Tabar4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Mary Ann Moran vs Leah Ward / Virginia Jordan6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDennise Antonio / Kathy Pavelcak vs Karen Eller / Marian Wenck4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Senior Storm:Wenck0610819172
2LS:65& 7.0:Pavelcak0681021161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Philippa Mannino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kathy Pavelcak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Beverly Costello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Hollis Ridgway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Ann Moran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Carolyn Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Kim de Matteo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Rebecca Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Kathleen Caldarella
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Dennise Antonio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jo-Ann Staves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Ulrich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Passarello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheryl Ash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Costello + Carolyn Caldwell8555% games+7.1% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Philippa Mannino271852% games+5.2% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Philippa Mannino5849% games+5.0% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Mary Ann Moran4254% games+2.5% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Mary Ann Moran61344% games+2.3% vs expected
Mary Ann Moran + Hollis Ridgway7557% games+2.2% vs expected
Dennise Antonio + Kathleen Caldarella5161% games+1.9% vs expected
Philippa Mannino + Carolyn Caldwell6554% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philippa Mannino
66W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
Kathy Pavelcak
72W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Beverly Costello
82W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Hollis Ridgway
33W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Mary Ann Moran
47W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carolyn Caldwell
55W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Kim de Matteo
57W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
Rebecca Coffey
59W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
Kathleen Caldarella
55W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Dennise Antonio
51W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Jo-Ann Staves
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Ulrich
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Passarello
28W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheryl Ash
34W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.