Teams

Griffith/Hoffman

2026 Anne Arundel Doubles Fall Women · Anne Arundel Doubles Fall 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.79 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Southgate Old Mill Park
Sep 18 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Truxtun Park
Sep 22 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Fox Hill Park
Sep 30 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Truxtun Park
Oct 8 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Truxtun Park
Oct 16 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Truxtun Park
Oct 20 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Southgate Old Mill Park
Oct 30 9:00 AM
vs Ladonna Griffith-LesesneCathy Hoffman
Fox Hill Park
2026-09-02vs SelbyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Cassandra West vs Janella Astrero / Stephanie Ruskin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMala Filippell / Linda Harrell vs Sandra Julian / Sarah Coster6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLara Henneman / Cathy Hoffman vs Lori Connors-Tadros / Kay Kalber6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Doubles Fall 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Cassandra West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Anne Schaefer
published 3
2.77
Mala Filippell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Terri Windsor
published 3
2.55
Beverly Taylor
published 3
2.53
Linda Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Cathy Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
2.31
Lara Henneman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Teresa McKeever
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne + Lara Henneman123 matchesnot enough data
Cassandra West + Terri Windsor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cassandra West
64W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Anne Schaefer
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
Mala Filippell
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Terri Windsor
140W–125L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Beverly Taylor
8W–15L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Linda Harrell
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Cathy Hoffman
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
38W–83L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Lara Henneman
21W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Teresa McKeever
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.