Teams

LVTA NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-12vs MLF BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Adam Less vs Nicholas Roe / Scott Daigle7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Ault / Dennis Flanigan vs Wil Buchanan / Jeremy Johnson7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2023-08-22vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Daniel Ault vs Ted Ray / Jim Kelly2-6, 3-6
2023-08-15vs FCCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Less / Brian Smith vs Josh Shelby / Mark Koepke6-4, 6-0
2023-08-13vs HMTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Adam Less vs Michael Robeson / John Beggs6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Petersen / Dennis Flanigan vs Jameel Chohan / Nicola Demacopoulos3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-08vs MLF BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAdam Less / Brian Smith vs Joe Ashbee / Nicholas Roe6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Daniel Ault vs Wil Buchanan / Jeremy Johnson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Josh Achtemeier
published
3.86
Jared Petersen
published
3.82
Adam Less
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Dennis Flanigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brian Petersen
published 3.5
Daniel Ault
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Petersen + Adam Less4254% games−0.4% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Dennis Flanigan2345% games−5.6% vs expected
Brian Petersen + Dennis Flanigan0534% games−19.5% vs expected
Dennis Flanigan + Adam Less6257% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Flanigan + Daniel Ault134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Achtemeier
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.86
Jared Petersen
68W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Adam Less
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Dennis Flanigan
52W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brian Petersen
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Ault
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.