Teams

Evans

2022 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '21 · Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2021-11-01vs CVTA/Jill RobinsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucky Chan / Margie DeShon vs Caroline Fincher / Jill Robinson6-4, 6-4
2021-10-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Carroll vs Margie DeShon - (DQ)2-6, 1-6
2021-10-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesMargie DeShon vs Tabitha Gallman6-0, 6-1
2021-10-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCindy Rivers McGraw vs Margie DeShon - (DQ)0-6, 2-6
2021-10-18vs CargleLost 01
L#3 DoublesAngela Evans / Margie DeShon vs Sarah Cargle / Melissa McGhee6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2021-10-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSuzanne House vs Margie DeShon - (DQ)0-6, 1-6
2021-10-11vs CVTA JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargie DeShon / Lucky Chan vs Chris Tarpley / Shawn Mashburn6-4, 6-2
2021-10-04vs LottWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucky Chan / Margie DeShon vs Phyllis Searles / Pamela Peal4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-09-29vs FowlerLost 01
L#1 SinglesMargie DeShon vs Olivia Williams1-6
2021-09-27vs CVTA/Jill RobinsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargie DeShon / Lucky Chan vs Theresa Dulaney / Jill Robinson7-5, 6-4
2021-09-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesShellie McGraw vs Margie DeShon - (DQ)0-6, 0-6
2021-09-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesHannah McClain vs Margie DeShon - (DQ)1-6, 2-6
2021-09-13vs CargleLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Powell / Margie DeShon vs Janice Doss / Leigh Kosater2-6, 2-6
2021-09-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAllie Cox vs Margie DeShon - (DQ)4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jewel Akpose
published
3.31
Robin Sorrow
published
2.99
2.91
Suleyka Miranda
published 3
2.79
Dina Vick
published 3
2.73
Alea Khuong
published 3
2.63
Angela Evans
published 3
Margie DeShon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina Vick + Alea Khuong8850% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jewel Akpose
71W–78L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Robin Sorrow
48W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Anna Kate Dulaney
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Suleyka Miranda
28W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Dina Vick
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Alea Khuong
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Angela Evans
20W–40L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 14 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.