Teams

Montana Dare Doubles

2021 65 & Over League · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-21vs Bozeman 65sLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Shannon / Anne Caprio vs Karen Vinton / Linda Stancil7-5, 4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Barton / Marie Neergaard vs Nancy Barber / Patti Oakes7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRitva Porter / Jan DeCosse vs Shirley Hansen / Kathy Nelson6-4, 4-6, 4-6
2021-08-20vs Bozeman 65sLost 12
W#1 DoublesJan DeCosse / Ritva Porter vs Nancy Barber / Kathy Nelson7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnne Caprio / Carol Shannon vs Shirley Hansen / Karen Vinton5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Neergaard / Mary Orr vs Patti Oakes / Linda Stancil4-6, 6-4, 4-6
2021-08-20vs Bozeman 65sLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Caprio / Ritva Porter vs Shirley Hansen / Linda Stancil3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Barton / Marie Neergaard vs Patti Oakes / Kathy Nelson4-6, 6-4, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJan DeCosse / Mary Orr vs Karen Vinton / Nancy Barber7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 - 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Carol Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Jan DeCosse
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Anne Caprio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Debbie Oliver
published
Elizabeth Barton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Neergaard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ritva Porter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ritva Porter + Anne Caprio3255% gamesnot enough data
Marie Neergaard + Anne Caprio123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Shannon
58W–62L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jan DeCosse
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Anne Caprio
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Debbie Oliver
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Elizabeth Barton
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie Neergaard
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ritva Porter
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.