Teams

SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Monzon

2024 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs SD 7.0 SDTRC/ AdamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesIrene Steinwinder / John Masterson vs Michelle Adams / Ryan Adams2-6, 1-6
2024-02-24vs SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ GamaraWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorena Monzon / Jason Meyer vs Jon Cieslak / Elizabeth McLean6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIrene Steinwinder / John Masterson vs Pamela Barnett / Chris Gardner7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Dube / Eric Snover vs Felicia Danielle Oliva / Jerome Chang6-3, 6-1
2024-02-17vs SD 7.0 Incredoubles @Balboa/ EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJason Meyer / Gladys Esponda vs Raghu Shettigar / Tori Penick4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEric Snover / Erica Meyer vs Anna Brigham / Patrick Mallory6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErica Meyer / John Masterson vs Viviana Rozo / Nick Runde6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-01-13Won 30
W#1 DoublesJason Meyer / Gladys Esponda vs Sarah Schultzel / Paul Yi7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Snover / Donna Dube vs Joseph Petrotta / Vanessa Imani6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Masterson / Erica Meyer vs Anand Gowda / Mallory Krkoska6-0, 6-2
2024-01-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Meyer / Gladys Esponda vs Austin Henry / Kristin Henry6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Gladys Esponda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Irene Steinwinder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Erica Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Kate Gill
published
3.13
Matt Whitmire
published
3.08
Donna Dube
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
John Masterson
published
2.98
Lorena Monzon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Richard Schwab
published
Natalie Whitmire
published
Rebecca Riley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gladys Esponda
156W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
3.5
Irene Steinwinder
71W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Erica Meyer
69W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Kate Gill
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Matt Whitmire
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Donna Dube
118W–125L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
John Masterson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Lorena Monzon
68W–95L career · 1 line in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Richard Schwab
3W–25L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.76
Natalie Whitmire
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Riley
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.