Teams

2WESS-GIRON 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5

2022 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 2.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesJill Bednas / Gretta Abu-Isa vs MaryKate Brockway / Carmela Khury1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSirlei Mendes / Ashley Baker vs Bonnie Treece / Laura Schepper0-6, 4-6
2022-07-18vs 4SCWB-LOVY 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5Split 11
L#1 DoublesVicki Giron / Jill Bednas vs Wendy Hubert / Barbara Goode2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSirlei Mendes vs Angela Hogan6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesGretta Abu-Isa / Ashley Baker vs Kae Ohgata / Yuliya Lokshina3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJill Bednas vs Nedi Gari0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Giron / Sirlei Mendes vs Karen McNamara / Carlee Meyers4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSirlei Mendes / Stacey Tranter vs Denise Weisgerber / Lina E Bata3-6, 1-4
L#1 SinglesGretta Abu-Isa vs Jennifer Mitchell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJill Bednas / Ashley Baker vs Silvia Acciaioli / Melissa Johnson3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesGretta Abu-Isa / Sirlei Mendes vs Lisa Sullivan / Malika Chaudhuri6-4, 2-2
L#2 DoublesVicki Giron / Iara Brophy vs MaryKate Brockway / Carmela Khury1-6, 0-6
2022-06-06vs 4SCWB-LOVY 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5Split 11
L#1 DoublesVicki Giron / Gretta Abu-Isa vs Jennifer Lovy / Patrice Steele2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSirlei Mendes / Stacey Tranter vs Rebecca Jerris / Kim Heller6-1, 7-5
L#1 DoublesSirlei Mendes / Gretta Abu-Isa vs Carlee Meyers / Kae Ohgata1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVicki Giron vs Tatyana Latinsky1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJill Bednas / Deanne Seifert vs Karen McNamara / Janice Norville5-7, 0-6
2022-05-16vs 3WESS-BROWN 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDeanne Seifert / Stacey Tranter vs Tamela Froeschke / Jennifer Mitchell4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSirlei Mendes vs Janet Yuhas4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 2.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.71 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gretta Abu-Isa
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
1.71
Deanne Seifert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Iara Brophy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Bednas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sirlei Mendes
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Vicki Giron
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Gretta Abu-Isa
2W–13L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Deanne Seifert
6W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.71
Iara Brophy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jill Bednas
16W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sirlei Mendes
16W–19L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicki Giron
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.