← Teams

MPRC-Avenoso

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Gregg Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Steve Bolstad
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Patrick Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Ken Avenoso
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Keith Abel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Zhitong Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Eric Goldner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.30
Rick Wong
published 3.5
Results11 ties
2024-09-14Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSteve Bolstad / Bill Henderson vs Mark Jackson / Nelson Gourley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCarlin Jackson / Steve Bolstad vs Jeffrey Bayless / Tim Leatherman6-1, 6-1
2024-09-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSteve Bolstad / Bill Henderson vs Mick Horton / Paul Lorring6-4, 6-3
2024-06-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Patrick Brewer vs Jim Fredericks / John Hall6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Abel / Steve Bolstad vs Brian McDonagh / Doug Post6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesZhitong Chen / Gregg Palmer vs Nate Look / Marc DeSantis7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Abel / Steve Bolstad vs Martin Schnappenberger / Stefan Olander7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKen Avenoso / Tod Johnston vs Daniel Albrecht / Paul Stutzman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-01Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesZhitong Chen / Gregg Palmer vs Jeff Lewis / Tony Khamsouk6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKen Avenoso / Steve Bolstad vs John Christiaan / Robert Ferek6-3, 6-2
2024-05-25Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Chuck Gooding vs Charlie Adams / Jeremy Fields6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKen Avenoso / Patrick Brewer vs Chris Hasle / MICHAEL DOHERTY6-3, 6-3
2024-05-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Zhitong Chen vs Jae Joon Kang / Marcus Kroloff6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKen Avenoso / Patrick Brewer vs Jeroen Swanborn / Sam Bradshaw7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChuck Gooding / Eric Goldner vs Jonathan Caplan / Bill Christensen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Zhitong Chen vs Tom Lux / Alex Simpson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteve Bolstad / Keith Abel vs Willis Boyer / William Malloch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Goldner / Tod Johnston vs David Finkelman / Damon Ogden7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Zhitong Chen vs Nishant Lakshman / Michael Ollinger6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKeith Abel vs Bryan Gonzalvo6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteve Bolstad / Eric Goldner vs Vimal Natarajan / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti7-5, 6-2
2024-04-21Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesZhitong Chen / Gregg Palmer vs Tom Lux / Alex Simpson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEric Goldner vs Rohit Colaco6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKen Avenoso / Patrick Brewer vs Willis Boyer / David Finkelman0-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Gregg Palmer
182W–77L career
0%94%6%
3.92
4
Steve Bolstad
67W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Patrick Brewer
68W–59L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Ken Avenoso
69W–67L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Keith Abel
54W–58L career
5%95%0%
3.65
4
Zhitong Chen
76W–42L career
12%88%0%
3.63
4
Eric Goldner
30W–18L career
26%74%0%
3.57
3.5
Rick Wong
51W–50L career
1%97%2%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.