Teams

BC-Tursa/Anderson

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Priyanka Prasad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2022-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRatish Prasad / Priyanka Prasad vs Jessica Riippi / Stephen Hewitt6-4, 6-3
2022-07-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesRatish Prasad / Priyanka Prasad vs Carlos Apacible / Dawn Apacible6-2, 7-5
2022-05-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesPriyanka Prasad / Indu Tursa vs Jessica Crump / Bridget Schauer6-1, 6-2
2022-05-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Stark / Priyanka Prasad vs Debbie Schrock / Cindy Gamber6-1, 6-3
2022-05-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesPriyanka Prasad / Marci Owen vs Robin Aronson / Debra Simmonds6-1, 6-2
2022-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesSherilyn Anderson / Priyanka Prasad vs Keiko Aikawa / Marni Klein6-2, 6-2
2022-04-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesPriyanka Prasad / Sandra Stark vs Melanie Fix / Rachel Mansfield0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdina Friedman / Priyanka Prasad vs Carol Markham / Debbie Dymarkowski6-1, 6-2
2021-12-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesRatish Prasad / Priyanka Prasad vs Cherry Ching / Justin VonGortler6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Priyanka Prasad
65W–35L career
2%98%0%
3.24

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.