← Teams

SHC-Fogg/Griffin

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Michelle Beilstein
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.74
Michele O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.41
Katie Terrill
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Ruth Semon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
—
Katherine Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
—
Nichole Anglin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Watt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim Christensen
published 3.5
—
Gina Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 0
Results11 ties
2022-10-02Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Katherine Farrell vs Christopher Casey / Cathleen Karcher6-1, 6-4
2022-10-02Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Katherine Farrell vs Steve Hutchins / Kathleen Letourneau7-5, 6-3
2022-10-01Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Katherine Farrell vs John Ferry / Susan Lammers6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-13Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMichele O'Brien / Michelle Beilstein vs Dana Baioni / Michelle Posey6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Bethany Bounds7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Barsotti / Katherine Farrell vs Marcy Bernhardt / Caroline Popma6-3, 6-2
2022-02-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChrys Culver / Michele O'Brien vs Rebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Hailey Swisher6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Hart / Ruth Semon vs Maya Mori / Morganne Hatfield6-0, 6-4
2022-02-20Won 4–0
W#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Angie Gordon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Griffin / Gina Meyer vs Mary Priester / Nina Hanson6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRuth Semon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Paula Watt vs Sheryl Riley / Dar Dragoon7-6, 6-2
2022-02-11Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Barbara Griffin vs Suzanne Chambers / Jan Koenig6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRuth Semon vs Elizabeth Cook6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Kylie Kollar6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Watt / Michele O'Brien vs Marilyn Sims / Kathy Cook7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChrys Culver / Michele O'Brien vs Susan McMullin / Cheryl Geisler6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Andrea Kropp6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRuth Semon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-22Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesMichele O'Brien / Katherine Farrell vs Stephanie Jones / Lisa West6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Christina Cork6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGina Meyer / Lana Lane vs Michele Beaman / CeCe Neumann6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKatie Terrill vs Queenie Hapke6-3, 6-3
2022-01-16Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesKatie Terrill vs Ann Tu6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Paula Watt vs Wanda Ng / Susan Rolfe6-1, 6-1
2022-01-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichele O'Brien / Katherine Farrell vs Celene Robert / Morganne Hatfield4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Terrill vs Melissa Bartoszewski6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGina Meyer / Michele Hart vs Rebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michelle Beilstein
99W–72L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Michele O'Brien
101W–43L career
1%99%0%
3.74
3.5
Katie Terrill
28W–27L career
0%93%7%
3.41
3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–32L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Katherine Farrell
43W–32L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Nichole Anglin
81W–65L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Paula Watt
43W–47L career
15%82%2%
3.17
3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13
0
Gina Meyer
28W–17L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.