Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/40+W(Hufft)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRoslynn Betson / Mabel Evans vs Alison Leben / Nydia Correa5-7, 0-6
2025-02-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoslynn Betson / Sonia Ramirez vs Analisa Cordova / Erica Sheid6-2, 6-1
2025-02-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRoslynn Betson / Linda Burns vs Daniela Minjares / Gabriela Navarro0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-2.5-Adult/40+W(Correa)(EPCC#2)62141024186
2GEPTA-2.5-Adult/40+W(McCarthy)(EPTC)5315921165
3GEPTA-2.5-Adult/40+W(Hufft)(FB)35101429208
4GEPTA-2.5-Adult/40+W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)1561227181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ana Navedo
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
Delfina Lechuga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Adriana Ludwig
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.04
Felma Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 2.5
Carmen Lichlyter
published
Jennifer Derrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mabel Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Magdlyn St-Cyr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Roslynn Betson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sonia Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 19% · published
Sylvia Anaya
usually #1 Doubles 85%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Lichlyter + Delfina Lechuga2635% games−7.6% vs expected
Mabel Evans + Adriana Ludwig1634% gamesnot enough data
Mabel Evans + Sonia Ramirez1539% gamesnot enough data
Magdlyn St-Cyr + Sylvia Anaya224 matchesnot enough data
Ana Navedo + Sylvia Anaya213 matchesnot enough data
Felma Ramirez + Sonia Ramirez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Navedo
18W–13L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Delfina Lechuga
14W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Adriana Ludwig
4W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Felma Ramirez
7W–24L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Carmen Lichlyter
12W–37L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Derrick
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mabel Evans
2W–40L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Magdlyn St-Cyr
13W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roslynn Betson
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sonia Ramirez
16W–31L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sylvia Anaya
12W–12L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.