Teams

Swearingen

2024 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-19vs Duval/McGehee/18&Over4.5WLost 02
L#2 DoublesRuth Jones-Looney / Hiroko Frederick vs Carrigan Blanchard / Anne Billion5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Deering / Tami Moe vs Kerri Robison / Jill Saig0-6, 2-6
2024-07-14vs Duval/Ciesla/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesFaye Woods / Hiroko Frederick vs Fran Rollins / Aimee Powell2-6, 1-6
2024-06-23vs Duval/Ciesla/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesFaye Woods / Michiele Sherman vs Rebecca Sejeck / Dorothy Chiu2-6, 2-6
2024-06-02vs Duval/McGehee/18&Over4.5WLost 02
L#2 DoublesRuth Jones-Looney / Hiroko Frederick vs Meredith Frisch / Grace Costello4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTami Moe / Faye Woods vs Melissa Morgan-Gisel / Loretta Zubero2-6, 2-6
2024-05-18vs Duval/McGehee/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesFaye Woods / Tami Moe vs Loretta Zubero / Kymberly Kochis0-6, 2-6
2024-04-28vs Duval/Ciesla/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaine Ward / Faye Woods vs Julie Weiss / Geraldine Sy0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Carolina Rechy
published 4.5
4.26
Carolina Delgado
published 4.5
3.98
Faye Woods
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.93
Michiele Sherman
published
3.90
Elaine Ward
published
3.88
Julie Ferguson
published
3.85
Katie Deering
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.84
Ruth Jones-Looney
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.82
Hiroko Frederick
published
3.79
Connie Bones
published 4
Jennifer Munson
published
Lindsay Toth
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolina Rechy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Carolina Delgado
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Faye Woods
33W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Michiele Sherman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Elaine Ward
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Julie Ferguson
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.88
4
Katie Deering
85W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Ruth Jones-Looney
93W–65L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Hiroko Frederick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Amanda Swearingen
103W–71L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Connie Bones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Munson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Toth
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.