Teams

Pinellas/SPTC Matthews

2023 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-18vs SPTC JohnsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaurie Smith / Linda Wolf vs Laura Wetzel / Carrie Kilgroe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bell / Felicia Roller vs Sandy Martin / Jamie Stein6-2, 6-0
2023-03-04vs SPTC JohnsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathy Moll / Felicia Roller vs Jamie Stein / Karin Hartenbach6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaurie Smith / Lynn O'Brien vs Sandy Martin / Ellen Johnson6-2, 6-1
2023-02-25vs ELW HungivilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJenny Hughes / Laurie Smith vs Michele Ironsmith / Robyn Wittleder3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Clem / Elizabeth Burdick vs Teresa Orr / Kelly Hansen6-2, 6-1
2023-02-18vs ELW HungivilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesMelanie Clem / Elizabeth Burdick vs Anne Pulley / Debbie Dawson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Wolf / Laurie Smith vs Cheryll Carollo / Wendy Unger6-4, 6-4
2023-02-04vs SPTC JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn O'Brien / Laurie Smith vs Teresa Thompson / Karin Hartenbach6-3, 6-2
2023-01-28vs ELW HungivilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesFelicia Roller / Mary Klein vs Mary Raimondo / Wendy Unger6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn O'Brien / Laurie Smith vs Cheryll Carollo / Emily Signoracci6-1, 6-3
2023-01-14vs SPTC JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny Hughes / Laurie Smith vs Katie Healy / Ruth Barnett6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-07vs ELW HungivilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn O'Brien / Laurie Smith vs Robyn Wittleder / Michele Ironsmith5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Melanie Clem
published
3.80
Felicia Roller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Holly Charles
published 4
3.75
Kathy Moll
published
3.74
Jenny Hughes
published
3.70
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Janet Matthews
published
Mary Klein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Hughes + Laurie Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Clem
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Felicia Roller
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Holly Charles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Moll
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Jenny Hughes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 8 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Janet Matthews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Klein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.