Teams

Howell 3.0-4.0 TriLevel 18s

2023 Tri-Level 18 and Over · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Annie Diaz
published 4
3.51
Carmen Schrenkel
published 4
3.37
Lauren Reasner
published
3.08
Andrea Stewart
published 3.5
3.01
Estephany Ruano
published
2.97
Diana Light
published 3
2.93
Anna Mctaggart
published 3
2.87
Susie Brock
published
2.81
Sandra Kirk
published
2.63
Andrea Cordes
published 3
2.41
Gail Roberts
published
Faith Lemmond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Schrenkel + Annie Diaz2342% games−21.8% vs expected
Anna Mctaggart + Andrea Cordes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annie Diaz
16W–30L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carmen Schrenkel
17W–31L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Lauren Reasner
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Andrea Stewart
52W–48L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Estephany Ruano
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Diana Light
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Anna Mctaggart
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Susie Brock
27W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Sandra Kirk
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Andrea Cordes
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.63
Gail Roberts
20W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%73%27%
2.41
Faith Lemmond
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.