Teams

Am.Bauer18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-08vs Al.Crumpler18ALost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Wassel / Carolyn Roach vs Heather Brewer / Kristi Koren2-6, 0-6
2025-05-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesKristen Wassel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-24vs Ma.LaPlante18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLena Gott / Michelle Welborn vs Allison DeMacy / Karen Ice3-6, 0-6
2025-04-17vs Ka.Brinckerhoff18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Wassel vs Nikki DAmbrose3-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs Ad.Brewer18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Wassel vs Mary Beth Broyles0-6, 1-6
2025-03-20vs Ta.Borsuk18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Roach / Michelle Welborn vs Heidi Sloan / Judith Gallagher2-6, 2-6
2025-03-13vs Le.Ragsdale18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesLena Gott / Kristen Wassel vs Kim von Weihe / Carrie Vander Vennet2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Roach / Michelle Welborn vs Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger / Alex van Staveren0-6, 1-6
2025-03-06vs Mo.Sheets/Delorme18ALost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Bauer / Michelle Welborn vs Rachel Brown / Stephanie Ferrell5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Bowler
published 4
3.60
Kesah DeLisio
published
3.58
Keri Allen
published
3.53
Ashley McCollum
published 3.5
3.44
Samantha Starr
published
3.42
Mary Jo Nugent
published
3.40
Kristen Wassel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Megan Liles
published
3.36
Carolyn Roach
published 3.5
3.33
Lena Gott
published
3.32
Amanda Bauer
published 3.5
3.27
Michelle Welborn
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Sherrie Smith
published
3.21
Jacqueline Engle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherrie Smith + Michelle Welborn3351% games+0.6% vs expected
Samantha Starr + Amanda Bauer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Bowler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kesah DeLisio
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Keri Allen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ashley McCollum
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Samantha Starr
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Mary Jo Nugent
36W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Kristen Wassel
128W–83L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Megan Liles
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Carolyn Roach
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Lena Gott
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amanda Bauer
13W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Michelle Welborn
140W–117L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sherrie Smith
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jacqueline Engle
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.