Teams

COLLIER/Mutchnik/65&over8.0M

2024 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-13vs COLLIER/Mishko/65&over8.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Tammen / Jay Love vs Fred Drilling / Jay Freedman4-6, 1-6
2024-01-23vs World Tennis Club - HueyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJay Love / Craig Tammen vs Terry Funk / Kirk Huey3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-01-09vs COLLIER/Mishko/65&over8.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJay Love / Craig Tammen vs Robert Kuehling / Fred Drilling2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Don Carter
published
3.48
Craig Tammen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Donald Scanlon
published
Frank Carrabba
published
Gary Despins
published
Hugh Davis
published
Jay Love
published
Len Forner
published
Philip Ludwig
published
Richard Schneider
published
Ronald Mutchnik
published
Steve Geller
published
Tomie Faganely
published
Vernon Keesey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomie Faganely + Gary Despins12263% gamesnot enough data
Jay Love + Donald Scanlon5356% gamesnot enough data
Jay Love + Craig Tammen3248% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tammen + Steve Geller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Don Carter
5W–20L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Craig Tammen
199W–143L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Donald Scanlon
31W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Frank Carrabba
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gary Despins
14W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hugh Davis
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jay Love
58W–46L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Len Forner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Ludwig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Schneider
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronald Mutchnik
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Geller
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tomie Faganely
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vernon Keesey
30W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.