Teams

Sias

2026 Tri-Level Metro · 4.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jules Becker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Vincent Tran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Nam Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Van Sias
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nam Nguyen + Jules Becker5943% games−1.1% vs expected
Vincent Tran + Nam Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jules Becker
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
Vincent Tran
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Nam Nguyen
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Van Sias
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.