Teams

R&J AZAMOVA/CRP (2.5/3.0/3.5)

2025-2026 Racquets & Jackets Tri-Level Doubles · Women Division C (2.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.11 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#3 Female DoublesDanielle Russo / Kimberly Varshine vs Cynthia Enright / Rebecca Pugh6-1, 6-1
W#3 Female DoublesDanielle Russo / Jennifer Haigler vs Cindy Orr / Jennifer Johnston2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-05vs RJ-Bartolucci/RRLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesWendy Lawson / Danielle Russo vs Whitney Bere / Andi Swanick7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-22vs RJ Bessler-Welch/CRPWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesKimberly Varshine / Wendy Lawson vs Bethany Zipf / Julie Giammattei7-5, 6-1
2026-01-15vs RJ-Berkley/JettonLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesJennifer Haigler / Kimberly Varshine vs Heidi Berkley / Bradee Cicchinelli5-7, 1-6
W#3 Female DoublesDanielle Russo / Wendy Lawson vs Cynthia Enright / Anna Kellar6-3, 6-2
2025-12-23vs RJ-Bartolucci/RRWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesWendy Lawson / Jennifer Haigler vs Andi Swanick / Holly Ridgway6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesDanielle Russo / Wendy Lawson vs Cindy Orr / Sandra Dunn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-12-04vs RJ Bessler-Welch/CRPWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesChristine Rowland / Jennifer Haigler vs Bethany Zipf / Cecilia Ringuette6-2, 6-3
2025-11-20vs RJ-Berkley/JettonWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesWendy Lawson / Christine Rowland vs Bryn Rose / Zerlina Suggs4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · Women Division C (2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RJ-Bartolucci/RR8223718210
2RJ-Berkley/Jetton72151226245
3R&J AZAMOVA/CRP (2.5/3.0/3.5)73201027232
4RJ Cassidy/Caldwell Park6216818187
5RJ-BLIXT-Lake Effect/BAILEY53121227225
6RJ-Ritter/Bailey Road44141025212
7RJ-Romley (Tri 2.5/3.0/3.5)-Jetton3581633210
8RJ-WGoodwin-Arctic Ice Thursday/NMP37151533282
9RJ Bessler-Welch/CRP37111943311
10RJ-STheisen/BAILEY26101431227
11RJ-BEARDSLEE/Westport 'C' Thurs AM1832449313

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Tamilla Azamova
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Levy
published
3.20
Ursula Kleimeier
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Julia Mueller
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Natalie Reid
published
2.91
Sallie Cune
usually #2 Female Doubles 63%, also #3 Female Doubles 38% · published 3
2.85
Shelly McCue
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
TRACY CROMIE
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.82
Denise Takes
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Danielle Russo
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Randi McClanahan
usually #3 Female Doubles 63%, also #2 Female Doubles 38% · published 3
2.72
Wendy Lawson
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Charlotte Rorech
usually #3 Female Doubles 57%, also #2 Female Doubles 43% · published 3
2.52
Jennifer Haigler
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
2.38
Kimberly Varshine
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lisa Wilkens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Takes + Shelly McCue253647% games−3.9% vs expected
Julia Mueller + Denise Takes31140% games−11.2% vs expected
Julia Mueller + Shelly McCue3545% gamesnot enough data
Randi McClanahan + Sallie Cune2346% gamesnot enough data
Charlotte Rorech + Julia Mueller044 matchesnot enough data
Shelly McCue + Randi McClanahan314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Levy + Ursula Kleimeier033 matchesnot enough data
Charlotte Rorech + Randi McClanahan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tamilla Azamova
36W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Lisa Levy
18W–29L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ursula Kleimeier
34W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Julia Mueller
93W–161L career · 8 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Natalie Reid
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Sallie Cune
77W–82L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Shelly McCue
69W–116L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3.5
TRACY CROMIE
3W–21L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
3
Denise Takes
125W–152L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Danielle Russo
38W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Randi McClanahan
40W–48L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Wendy Lawson
67W–51L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Charlotte Rorech
22W–132L career · 7 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Jennifer Haigler
22W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Christine Rowland
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Kimberly Varshine
29W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Lisa Wilkens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.