Teams

A.George

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-12vs E.PerryLost 12
L#1 SinglesElisabeth McMahon vs Kate Cannon4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBlair Risinger / Allison Creasman Marsh vs Sarah Barnhill / Neal Goodwin4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLesley Knight / Helen Williams vs Gina Minton / Mabel Pace6-3, 6-3
2023-05-11vs C.WINZENZLost 12
W#1 SinglesAllison Creasman Marsh vs Emily Dorn6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLouise Taft Welch / Louisa Garvey vs Genevieve Rockett / Marianne Jensen3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrette Best / Lesley Knight vs Cindy Winzenz / Sherene Halko3-6, 4-6
2023-05-05Won 30
W#1 SinglesLesley Knight vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrette Best / Louise Taft Welch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeah Ragsdale / Julie Tuttle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-25vs T.PariseWon 20
W#2 DoublesBlair Risinger / Allison Creasman Marsh vs Elizabeth Speicher / Laura Hiller6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLesley Knight / Tonya Chapman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-21vs L.IhlySplit 11
L#2 DoublesLesley Knight / Brette Best vs Lisa Ihly / Allison Ostrander0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElisabeth McMahon / Stephanie Disbrow vs Ruth Stephenson / Stacy Rank6-1, 7-5
2023-03-31vs E.PerryLost 12
L#1 DoublesLesley Knight / Louisa Garvey vs Emily Perry / Neal Goodwin4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesElisabeth McMahon vs Ramona Holdstock2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Creasman Marsh / Blair Risinger vs Gina Minton / Michelle Jones6-4, 6-0
2023-03-27vs L.IhlyLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllison Creasman Marsh / Alissa Hennen vs Allison Ostrander / Stacy Rank6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLouisa Garvey / Blair Risinger vs Violaine Romans-Murray / Felita Clark4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLesley Knight / Louise Taft Welch vs Lisa Ihly / Michelle Vedder4-6, 5-7
2023-03-24vs J.AventLost 12
L#1 SinglesAllison Creasman Marsh vs Lucy Lewis4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBlair Risinger / Tonya Chapman vs Nicole Rahm / Courtney Whalen6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLeah Ragsdale / Julie Tuttle vs Jeme Avent / Allison Graves3-6, 4-6
2023-03-17vs C.WINZENZWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlissa Hennen / Blair Risinger vs Brooke DeMarco / Genevieve Rockett6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLesley Knight vs Emily Dorn6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLouisa Garvey / Louise Taft Welch vs Sherene Halko / Cindy Winzenz5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Creasman Marsh / Helen Williams vs Rachael Boland / Kristen O'Connor6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Allison Creasman Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
Alissa Hennen
published 4.5
4.24
Blair Risinger
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.17
Louise Taft Welch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Lesley Knight
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.90
Brette Best
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Leah Ragsdale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Julie Tuttle
published
3.71
Elisabeth McMahon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Stephanie Disbrow
published
3.67
Tonya Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Tuttle + Leah Ragsdale10556% games+4.9% vs expected
Allison Creasman Marsh + Blair Risinger6163% games+2.7% vs expected
Louise Taft Welch + Lesley Knight8653% games−6.4% vs expected
Tonya Chapman + Lesley Knight10853% gamesnot enough data
Tonya Chapman + Brette Best3545% gamesnot enough data
Allison Creasman Marsh + Tonya Chapman3351% gamesnot enough data
Brette Best + Elisabeth McMahon3354% gamesnot enough data
Leah Ragsdale + Elisabeth McMahon2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Creasman Marsh
40W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Alissa Hennen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Blair Risinger
118W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Louise Taft Welch
79W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.17
4
Lesley Knight
111W–108L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Brette Best
76W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Leah Ragsdale
132W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
Julie Tuttle
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Elisabeth McMahon
72W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Stephanie Disbrow
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Tonya Chapman
142W–123L career · 9 lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.