Teams

PENINSULA CC 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-23vs MONTE VISTA HS 40AW3.5CLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenisa Satrijo vs Andrea Bryan-Grout1-6, 2-5
2025-02-08vs CASTLEWOOD CC 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesRenisa Satrijo vs Julia Gillette6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Junko Tanaka
published
3.13
Janet Stebbins
published
3.12
Suzy Sin
published
3.07
Pamela Fuerst
published
3.06
Rosa Lopez
published
3.06
Gina Kelley
published
3.04
Andrea Gruner
published 3.5
3.04
Kathy Buckley
published
3.03
Melynnie Rizvi
published
2.97
Akiko Lip
published 3.5
2.97
Renisa Satrijo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Cecile Holweg
published 3
2.86
Vicki Benavente
published
2.77
Lisa McKenna
published
2.72
Laura Sorenson
published
2.66
Maggi Willard
published
2.64
Fang Cai
published
Laurel Dawson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Fuerst + Akiko Lip0635% games−9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Junko Tanaka
28W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Janet Stebbins
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Suzy Sin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Pamela Fuerst
4W–19L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Rosa Lopez
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Gina Kelley
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Andrea Gruner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Kathy Buckley
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Melynnie Rizvi
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Akiko Lip
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Renisa Satrijo
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Cecile Holweg
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Vicki Benavente
3W–21L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.86
Lisa McKenna
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77
Laura Sorenson
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
Maggi Willard
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Fang Cai
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.64
Laurel Dawson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.