Teams

Hankinson 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 18 & Over Men Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs Parker/Moore 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Whitehurst / Brooks Jackson vs Richard Parker / Grayson Parker3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarcus Simon / Cory Orms vs Cameron Smith / Philip Kuntz6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesZiad Fleihan / Tommy Houston vs Shepard Moore / Keenan Kaltenbacher2-6, 3-6
2026-08-26vs Parker/Moore 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcus Simon / Brooks Jackson vs Andrew Crone / Philip Kuntz4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarius Andersen / Cory Orms vs Shepard Moore / Jack Oldis5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Brad Falvey vs Cameron Smith / Michael Parker7-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Tommy Houston vs Andrew Crone / Duane Johnson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarcus Simon / Rob Campbell vs Grayson Parker / Michael Parker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Whitehurst / Ziad Fleihan vs Cameron Smith / Keenan Kaltenbacher4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 18 & Over Men Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dipesh Rao
published 5
4.69
John Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.63
Peter Whitehurst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.62
Marius Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Marcus Simon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.31
Tommy Houston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.13
Brooks Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Ziad Fleihan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Cory Orms
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Brad Falvey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Rob Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Whitehurst + Marcus Simon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dipesh Rao
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Hankinson
35W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
Peter Whitehurst
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.63
Marius Andersen
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.62
Marcus Simon
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
4.42
Tommy Houston
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Brooks Jackson
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.13
Ziad Fleihan
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Cory Orms
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Brad Falvey
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Rob Campbell
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.