Teams

SSHP BLUE

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-12vs LEBTC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Susan OBrien vs Meghan Page / Allison Langenderfer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTonya Berry / Karen Keehan Odendahl vs Kellie Naclerio / Elizabeth Freestone6-7, 3-6
2022-09-05vs HRCA BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Bolick / Amy Noverr vs Kristina Schomer / Kelly Crawley4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Tonya Berry vs Natalie Lucero / Cynthia Clifford6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBrooke Wagner vs Sarah Bryan2-6, 1-6
2022-08-15vs PH PINKWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Wendy Hynes vs Amy Attwood / Beth Wright3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEmma Katubig vs Jane Carlson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Karen Keehan Odendahl vs Tara Wolfe / Amy Stettner6-4, 6-2
2022-08-08vs LEBTC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Hynes / Emma Katubig vs Rachel Feiman / Lindsey McGraw4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAva Katubig vs Alesha Watson7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Susan OBrien vs Ingrid Burke / Kelly Callister7-6, 7-5
2022-08-01vs KC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan OBrien / Wendy Hynes vs Christine Angelini / Sarah Carlson6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCherie Mitchell vs Ashley Barto2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Amy Noverr vs Gina Schulz / Nathalia Urbano6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Ava Katubig
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Brooke Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.15
Gabriela Cerny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Tonya Berry
published
3.09
Susan OBrien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Emma Katubig
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Amy Noverr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Cherie Mitchell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keehan Odendahl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nicole Bolick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan OBrien + Brooke Wagner4158% games+9.6% vs expected
Amy Noverr + Brooke Wagner12554% games+9.2% vs expected
Gabriela Cerny + Tonya Berry8362% games+6.3% vs expected
Cherie Mitchell + Karen Keehan Odendahl231756% games+4.3% vs expected
Amy Noverr + Cherie Mitchell4160% gamesnot enough data
Amy Noverr + Susan OBrien314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Noverr + Gabriela Cerny314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Noverr + Tonya Berry314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ava Katubig
64W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Brooke Wagner
180W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Gabriela Cerny
72W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Tonya Berry
49W–22L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Susan OBrien
76W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Emma Katubig
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Amy Noverr
109W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cherie Mitchell
47W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Karen Keehan Odendahl
76W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Nicole Bolick
38W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.