Teams

Lagoon Loe

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA 40&Over Mixed Doubles League-Montgomery

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 Fall USTA 40&Over Mixed Doubles League-Montgomery
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lagoon Loe4110513112
2Lagoon-Smith 4.0 Mixed Fall1451021151

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Michelle Slack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.90
Edwin Hampton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.89
Mitchell Powell
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
3.85
David Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.84
Greg Alford
published 4
3.81
Mark Caradori
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
James Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.69
Ashley Gallion
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Keith Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
David Loe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Erin Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Black
published
Stuart Yelverton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitchell Powell + Greg Alford9070% games+3.5% vs expected
Mitchell Powell + David Burke404 matchesnot enough data
Mark Caradori + Greg Alford314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Slack + Jennifer Black404 matchesnot enough data
James Armstrong + Greg Alford404 matchesnot enough data
Greg Alford + Edwin Hampton404 matchesnot enough data
Keith Wilson + Greg Alford303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Slack
32W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Edwin Hampton
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Mitchell Powell
21W–4L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
David Burke
35W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Greg Alford
77W–37L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Mark Caradori
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
James Armstrong
17W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Ashley Gallion
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Keith Wilson
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
David Loe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Erin Bradshaw
18W–2L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Black
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stuart Yelverton
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.