Teams

MGonzalez/SKennen (OPRC)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 8.5 Men - Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-08vs JWolf (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRavi Mujumdar / John Semones vs Kevin Conway / Randy Barrett6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-01vs BSmith/JNichols (Park Road)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesStephen Kennen / David Halvorsen vs David Gora / James Nichols6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Semones / Duncan Thompson vs Felipe Bautista / Tom Shober4-6, 5-7
2024-09-17vs JClarke/MWaleski (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Halvorsen / Ravi Mujumdar vs Sahil Vasa / Richard Merino3-6, 3-6
2024-09-10vs CGardner/Zelepouga (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Burns / John Semones vs Anatoly Zelepouga / Raj Voleti4-6, 3-6
2024-08-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Halvorsen / Patrick Burns vs Alex King / Mario Henry6-7, 5-7
2024-08-20vs BBrowne/CCassino (Mason Wallace)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Burns / David Halvorsen vs Alex Beurle / Richard Schanzlin7-5, 6-3
2024-08-13vs JIngram (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAlan Efremoff / John Semones vs Alex Carver / Joshua Stone2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen Kennen / David Halvorsen vs Jared Ingram / Justin Wycoff3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 8.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Thomas Jeter
published
4.17
Patrick Burns
published
4.13
Alan Efremoff
published 4.5
4.12
Ravi Mujumdar
published
3.73
Sean Hickey
published
3.68
John England
published
3.68
David Halvorsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Duncan Thompson
published
3.67
John Semones
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Mario Gonzalez
published
Stephen Kennen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Halvorsen + John Semones13954% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Jeter
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Patrick Burns
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Alan Efremoff
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
Ravi Mujumdar
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Sean Hickey
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
John England
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
David Halvorsen
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Duncan Thompson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
John Semones
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Mario Gonzalez
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Kennen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.