Teams

RN-GRIFFIN

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRonald Burd / Julie Register vs Sorita Ann Carter / John Carter1-6, 4-6
2025-01-02vs RS-WILSONLost 01
L#2 DoublesRonald Burd / Julie Register vs Michael Forsyth / Brianne Smith3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Richard Ricks
published
3.39
Tuti Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Norm Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Diane Bloodworth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.18
Richie DeRojas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Christine Helms
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Charlie Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa McLendon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Julie Register
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ronald Burd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wesley Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norm Pearson + Christine Helms314 matchesnot enough data
Diane Bloodworth + Tuti Hawkins134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Helms + Tuti Hawkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Ricks
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Tuti Hawkins
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Norm Pearson
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
4
Diane Bloodworth
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Richie DeRojas
27W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christine Helms
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Charlie Arnold
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Lisa McLendon
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Julie Register
22W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Randy Griffin
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Burd
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wesley Cook
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.