Teams

Ca.Robayo18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-30vs Mo.Sheets18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Anna Kouba6-3, 7-6
2024-07-16vs Sh.Leaver18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesMinh NguyenLe vs Shannon Beach2-6, 2-6
2024-07-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-02Lost 01
L#3 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Jessica Malatesta7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-25vs Mo.Sheets18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMinh NguyenLe vs Laura Brown4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Emily Slater6-3, 6-0
2024-06-18vs Pa.Hankerson18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKari Barsness vs Pamela Hankerson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLaurene Fitzgerald vs Michelle Mills6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-06-11vs Sh.Leaver18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesMinh NguyenLe vs Laura Panebianco6-0, 6-1
2024-06-04vs Sa.Truitt18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesLaurene Fitzgerald vs OLIVIA ROBERSON6-2, 6-2
2024-05-28vs Em.Warren18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMinh NguyenLe vs Leslie Hinson6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kristine Sibillia
published
3.16
Carolina Robayo
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Angelica Rose
published 3.5
3.14
Gillian Kelleher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Minh NguyenLe
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.98
Kari Barsness
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.86
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolina Robayo + Gillian Kelleher2544% gamesnot enough data
Carolina Robayo + Laurene Fitzgerald1444% gamesnot enough data
Minh NguyenLe + Kristine Sibillia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Sibillia
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–188L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Angelica Rose
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
165W–164L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Minh NguyenLe
42W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Kari Barsness
125W–125L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Laura Rendon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.