Teams

Newk Em

2024 18 & Over Fall Weekday Women - NA · 4.0 Monday

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-11vs SACC AlleyCatsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeigha Cochran / Denise Tillman vs Joy Fuhrmann / Sugar Barnes6-0, 6-2
2024-10-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesLeigha Cochran / Jane Wilk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-16vs Court JestersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigha Cochran / Kristi Schaeper vs Zdenka Edgar / Andrea Turk6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Aly Gerloff
published 4
3.94
Samantha Kadish
published
3.88
Shannon Riser
published
3.88
Kristi Schaeper
published
3.86
Victoria Nanos
published
3.85
Denise Tillman
published 4
3.82
Elizabeth Snelling
published
3.82
Leigha Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Vicki Contreras
published
3.75
Jane Wilk
published
3.75
Tiffany May
published
3.68
Michelle Just
published
3.61
Nicole Schulze
published
3.60
3.47
Isabella Contreras
published
MacY Valdez
published
Rebecca Rios
published
Virginia Raborn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Kadish + Vicki Contreras6261% games−1.7% vs expected
Vicki Contreras + Leigha Cochran033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aly Gerloff
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Samantha Kadish
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Shannon Riser
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Kristi Schaeper
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Victoria Nanos
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Denise Tillman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Elizabeth Snelling
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Leigha Cochran
44W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Vicki Contreras
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Jane Wilk
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Tiffany May
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Michelle Just
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Nicole Schulze
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Bonnie Schweinsberg
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Isabella Contreras
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
MacY Valdez
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Rios
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Raborn
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.