Teams

ALACHUA/Porter/Men/8.5

2022 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-05vs DB - BlairWon 20
W#1 DoublesDrae Centonze / Zak Bernard vs Eric Esterline / Douglas Dace6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRoss van Boven / Christian Janowicz vs Vincent LoCascio / Newell Fox5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-11-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoss van Boven / Volker Mai vs Cody Gusto / Brian Ho6-4, 6-2
2022-10-30vs DB - BlairLost 02
L#1 DoublesDrae Centonze / Zak Bernard vs Donald Blair / Philip Karwacki5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Herriott / Ross van Boven vs Eric Esterline / Marc Schecter4-6, 6-7
2022-10-14vs DB - BlairSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristian Janowicz / Ethan Cockey vs Eric Ligman / Philip Karwacki7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDrae Centonze / Zak Bernard vs Cameron Slack / Vincent LoCascio6-3, 6-2
2022-10-08vs WS - PaulyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Herriott / David Porter vs Rupen Shah / Jungyun Hwang5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-01vs DB - BlairSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKejin Dong / Michael Herriott vs Vincent LoCascio / Cameron Slack3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDrae Centonze / Zak Bernard vs Donald Blair / Philip Karwacki6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.43
Ross van Boven
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.31
Christian Janowicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Ashok Kumar
published 4
3.71
Tedd Comerford
published
3.69
Erik Schmidt
published 4
3.48
Michael Herriott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ross van Boven + Michael Herriott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.51
Ross van Boven
100W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Christian Janowicz
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4
Ashok Kumar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tedd Comerford
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Erik Schmidt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Michael Herriott
42W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.