Teams

Laredo Heat

Fire & Ice 2024 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.5 Division

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-08vs Serve and SleighLost 03
L#1 DoublesKareny Arroyo / Dalia Martinez vs Katie Markoff - Case / Cari Spielhagen1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIssa Harsanyi / Sandra Noriega vs Brianna Eilers / Sara Stringfellow6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAissa Barberena / TANIA SALAZAR vs Kara Still / Darcy Hoberman6-7, 4-6
2024-12-08vs Happy VolleydaysWon 21
L#1 DoublesKareny Arroyo / Issa Harsanyi vs Abby Holahan / Monica Saenz-Vigil6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDalia Martinez / Sandra Noriega vs Amanda Sykes / Gretchen Brown7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTANIA SALAZAR / Aissa Barberena vs Michelle Gonzalez / Jennifer Jones6-1, 6-0
2024-12-06vs Hot ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Dellano / Issa Harsanyi vs Sandra Garza / Marcela Garza6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKareny Arroyo / Dalia Martinez vs Tatiann Lozano / Liza Richer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTANIA SALAZAR / Aissa Barberena vs Denise Sampayo / Alicia Medina7-5, 6-0
2024-12-06vs CC Fire & IceLost 12
L#1 DoublesTANIA SALAZAR / Aissa Barberena vs Lisa Garcia / Ronisha Christie1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesIssa Harsanyi / Sandra Noriega vs Emily Hellums / Jennifer Talackine6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Dellano / Dalia Martinez vs Catherine Clark / Nora Dowda4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.5 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aissa Barberena
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cynthia Romero
published 3.5
Dalia Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Issa Harsanyi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kareny Arroyo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Martha Dellano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Noriega
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
TANIA SALAZAR
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TANIA SALAZAR + Aissa Barberena3355% games+15.5% vs expected
Dalia Martinez + Kareny Arroyo123 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Noriega + TANIA SALAZAR303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aissa Barberena
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Romero
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dalia Martinez
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Issa Harsanyi
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kareny Arroyo
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Dellano
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Noriega
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
TANIA SALAZAR
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.