Teams

SSLT GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs HRCA SILVERLost 04
L#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Colleen Krebsbach vs Gretchen Burr / Claudia Swanson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Tharp vs Ann Patel2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Shannon Porter vs Kathleen Samuelli / Diana Youssef6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Julie Johns vs Brooke Sterling / Olivia Zuncic3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-26vs PCC REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller vs Rebecca Kobayashi / Judy Jackson4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNantida Hong vs Kim Vaughan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Julie Johns vs Julie Eisenrich / Rebecca Coakley3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Tharp vs Cathy Kerkhove2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Porter / Cinda Nab vs Tara Bramwell / Laura Freelove6-1, 6-4
2022-05-19vs PRC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesShannon Porter / Deborah Miller vs Amanda Caldwell / Liz Holt5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Colleen Krebsbach vs Denise Debartolomeis / Debra St John6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesDana Anderson vs Keenan Young1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCinda Nab / Melinda Shaffer vs Cindy Sanders / Christie Dyer4-6, 2-6
2022-05-12vs VCC ORANGESplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Dana Anderson vs Marnie Brockamp / Teresa Hymowitz2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNantida Hong vs Nickie Le6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Melinda Shaffer vs Karen Blach / Elizabeth Quinn6-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Tharp vs Kathy Dosen7-6, 6-2
2022-05-05vs CACI YELLOWLost 13
W#1 DoublesShannon Porter / Colleen Krebsbach vs Heidi Kelly / Georgina Swales6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAmy Tharp vs Allison Stewart6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Johns / Melinda Shaffer vs Angela D'Alessandro / Virginia Hinds7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Dana Anderson vs Joby Koren / Sherri Hartman2-6, 6-7
2022-04-28vs HRCA SILVERWon 32
W#1 DoublesJulie Johns / Dana Anderson vs Claudia Swanson / Kathleen Samuelli6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAdele Rhinehart vs Ann Patel1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Miller / Colleen Krebsbach vs Cathy Sorensen / Olivia Zuncic6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNantida Hong vs Michelle Davis4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCinda Nab / Amy Tharp vs Gretchen Burr / Jessica Seidlitz4-6, 6-7
2022-04-21vs PCC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller vs Rebecca Coakley / Heidi Lewis3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAdele Rhinehart vs Kim Vaughan4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarika Fodor / Shannon Porter vs Rebecca Kobayashi / Cathy Kerkhove2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNantida Hong vs Julie Eisenrich6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Dana Anderson vs Jana Brainerd / Juli Rennie6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Nantida Hong
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.35
Shannon Porter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Melinda Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Adele Rhinehart
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Dana Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.04
Colleen Krebsbach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Amy Tharp
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Julie Johns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Cinda Nab
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Marika Fodor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adele Rhinehart + Julie Johns2448% games+5.1% vs expected
Adele Rhinehart + Melinda Shaffer151450% games+3.6% vs expected
Cinda Nab + Shannon Porter2551% games−0.1% vs expected
Melinda Shaffer + Julie Johns31042% games−1.6% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Melinda Shaffer3843% games−3.2% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Adele Rhinehart61349% games−3.3% vs expected
Marika Fodor + Shannon Porter4548% games−3.5% vs expected
Colleen Krebsbach + Julie Johns6448% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nantida Hong
124W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Shannon Porter
47W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Melinda Shaffer
46W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Adele Rhinehart
96W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Anderson
40W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Colleen Krebsbach
63W–75L career · 6 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Tharp
24W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3.5
Julie Johns
29W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Cinda Nab
52W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
3.5
Marika Fodor
21W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.