Teams

TAG

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs MLFLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatrick Berkheim / Steve Weber vs Randy Hensley / James Cooper4-6, 4-6
2021-06-18vs LVTAWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatrick Berkheim / Steve Weber vs Jim Walker / Virgil Downing6-1, 6-3
2021-06-11vs CSUWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Berkheim / Steve Weber vs Ken Field / Dave Trammell6-3, 6-1
2021-05-28vs LVTALost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Weber / Jim Draper vs Bob Shearer / Del Benkendorf6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-21vs CSUWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Beckman / Steve Weber vs Mark Christensen / William Donkersgoed3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-07vs LVTAWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Pavilonis / Steve Weber vs Jim Walker / William Reents1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jack Tuttle
published 3.5
3.00
Steve Weber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Glen Buckingham
published 3.5
2.71
Eric Pavilonis
published 3
2.10
James Demersseman
published 2.5
Andy Peterson
published
Jim Draper
published
John Trull
published
Michael Malnati
published
Patrick Berkheim
published
Tim Beckman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Weber + Patrick Berkheim8945% gamesnot enough data
John Trull + Steve Weber5156% gamesnot enough data
Steve Weber + Jack Tuttle1440% gamesnot enough data
Jim Draper + Eric Pavilonis1437% gamesnot enough data
Tim Beckman + Michael Malnati134 matchesnot enough data
James Demersseman + Eric Pavilonis134 matchesnot enough data
John Trull + Jack Tuttle033 matchesnot enough data
Michael Malnati + Steve Weber033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jack Tuttle
13W–21L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Steve Weber
84W–159L career · 6 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Glen Buckingham
5W–14L career · no lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Eric Pavilonis
11W–35L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
James Demersseman
4W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Andy Peterson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jim Draper
3W–48L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Trull
14W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Malnati
3W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrick Berkheim
13W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Beckman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.