Teams

ETC-NetFlicks-Li

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-15vs MI-WolfeLost 13
L#1 DoublesChi Yi / Han Zhao vs Ken Wolfe / Philip Moberg2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesYang Chen vs Mario Kosmiskas6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMihai Popoaei / WENSI LI vs Marc Rousso / Richard Aylen1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Liu / Changsong Shen vs Greg Rosenwald / Madan Ankapura3-6, 2-6
2026-03-07vs BETC-Moon Ballers-SlatonLost 13
L#1 DoublesHan Zhao / Mihai Popoaei vs Steven Lockett / Lupe Gonzales6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesYang Chen vs Ted Calhoon6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChangsong Shen / Haakon Sorensen vs Michael Dillard / Arthur Nakata4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHyung Jin Lee / WENSI LI vs Scott Lane / Scott Monson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-02-28vs BC-Hitmen-SmithSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHan Zhao / Kyle Peterson vs Chase Costello / Jason Eggebrecht1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesYang Chen vs Michael Wang2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMihai Popoaei / Chi Yi vs Joseph Holmes / David Hasbrook6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesWENSI LI / Zhe Zhang vs Jared Oren / John Manning1-6, 2-6
2026-02-21vs AYTC-ThompsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesChi Yi / Han Zhao vs Matt MacArthur / Ivan Mi Yu6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYang Chen vs Jin Chen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrank Liu / Changsong Shen vs Aaron Eadson / Mohammad Forouzanfar6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHyung Jin Lee / Haakon Sorensen vs James Thompson / Terrance Creighton4-6, 4-6
2026-02-14vs CP-Racquet-Rascals-KesavWon 31
L#1 DoublesHan Zhao / Changsong Shen vs Atanas Koralski / Diego Piacentini6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHaakon Sorensen vs Kesav Kaliyaperumal6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChi Yi / Mihai Popoaei vs Mark LeMaster / Gregg Watkins7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHyung Jin Lee / Zhe Zhang vs Jeffrey Merrifield / Kit Merker6-1, 6-1
2026-02-01vs TCSP-Turn and Burn-PratleyWon 31
W#1 DoublesHan Zhao / Changsong Shen vs Andrew Buhayar / Matthew Thomas Allen7-5, 4-3
W#1 SinglesFrank Liu vs Travis Glover6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesZhe Zhang / Kyle Peterson vs Chris Pratley / Sachin Chouksey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChi Yi / Mihai Popoaei vs Ryan Mcintyre / Zekarias Araya6-0, 6-2
2026-01-16vs EDG-Warriors-MoosmanLost 13
L#1 DoublesHan Zhao / Haakon Sorensen vs Joel Higgins / Xianglong Huang6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesYang Chen vs Andy Zollers6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFrank Liu / WENSI LI vs Aaron Horton / Thomas Hei2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHyung Jin Lee / Zhe Zhang vs Ming Fan / Darren Carrido1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-03vs PL-ThakerLost 13
L#1 DoublesHan Zhao / Haakon Sorensen vs Nik Garkusha / Sunil Tahilramani0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesYang Chen vs SANCHIT AGARWAL6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyle Peterson / Changsong Shen vs Gaurav Tandon / Nikhil Thaker3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChi Yi / Mihai Popoaei vs Amit Kejriwal / Mikel Morrow1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Yang Chen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Frank Liu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Han Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Hyung Jin Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Zhe Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Haakon Sorensen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.65
Mihai Popoaei
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Chi Yi
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Changsong Shen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Kyle Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
WENSI LI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mihai Popoaei + Chi Yi5255% games+6.7% vs expected
Han Zhao + Changsong Shen5355% games+6.7% vs expected
Han Zhao + WENSI LI3260% games+5.5% vs expected
Chi Yi + Han Zhao2348% gamesnot enough data
Zhe Zhang + Hyung Jin Lee224 matchesnot enough data
Han Zhao + Haakon Sorensen134 matchesnot enough data
Zhe Zhang + Mihai Popoaei123 matchesnot enough data
Zhe Zhang + WENSI LI033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yang Chen
27W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Frank Liu
22W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Han Zhao
70W–54L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Hyung Jin Lee
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Zhe Zhang
25W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Haakon Sorensen
6W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Mihai Popoaei
22W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Chi Yi
30W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
3
Changsong Shen
36W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Kyle Peterson
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
WENSI LI
28W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.