Teams

Woodlake Cousineau 7.5

2026 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings23 teams · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews000000
2MAC - Hammers - Messmer000000
3Woodlake Cousineau 7.5000000
4ACAC Singh 7.5 Mixed Doubles000000
5V - Regulagedda 7.5 Mixed000000
6ACAC Jones mixed 7.5000000
7Bon Air Snow Problem000000
8ACAC Davis Racket Rebels 7.5000000
9The Westwood Alwinners - Alwine000000
10ACAC Lewis 7.5 Combo Mixed000000
11Avalon Ghita 7.5 Combo Mix000000
12CCV - Henry 7.5000000
13Woodlake - Ritter000000
14CCV Norfleet 7.5000000
15Williamson000000
16WOCC - Blackwood000000
17Burkwood Colgin Mixed 7.5000000
18MRTC Williams 7.5 Combo Mix000000
19KRA Daniel 7.5000000
20ACAC Delisio 7.5 Mixed000000
21Sal's Mixed Nuts 7.5 Combo Mix000000
22Burkwood Carter000000
23Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Leigh Ann Barker
published
3.68
Julie Kratzer
published
3.56
Elizabeth Hoover
published 4
3.53
Ross Overstreet
published
3.39
Michael Cousineau
published
3.26
Karen ODonnell
published
3.08
Dave McCoy
published 3.5
Jasmine Kaur
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Ann Barker
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Julie Kratzer
59W–41L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Elizabeth Hoover
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Ross Overstreet
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Michael Cousineau
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Karen ODonnell
16W–25L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dave McCoy
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jasmine Kaur
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.