Teams

Lance/JB/JCC

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-12vs Chambers/JB/APCCWon 20
W#2 SinglesPaige Cox vs Hannah Chambers6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLindsey Bowman vs Meghan Kenley6-0, 6-1
2024-11-24vs Chambers/JB/APCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesCasey Schatzley vs Alyssa Ishmael6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCaroline Rose vs Hannah Chambers6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCallie Kellums vs Audra McClung6-1, 6-3
2024-11-21vs Kibler/JB/RPCCWon 20
W#2 SinglesCallie Kellums vs Jamie Chandler6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCasey Schatzley vs Abby Husband6-0, 6-0
2024-11-17vs Kibler/JB/RPCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCasey Schatzley vs Maggie Barnes6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesPaige Cox vs Brittany McFadden6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-10vs Parker/JB/JCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesCasey Schatzley vs Tamara Lee6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPaige Cox vs Hannah McFadden6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesLindsey Bowman vs Audrey Niell6-4, 6-4
2024-11-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Lance vs Michelle Myers6-1, 6-1
2024-10-24vs Cobern/JB/3OaksSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCaroline Rose vs Erica Snider6-2, 3-6
W#3 SinglesCari Dunham vs Katie Spencer6-1, 6-0
2024-10-16vs Wade-Wildy/JB/APWon 10
W#3 SinglesLauren Lance vs Jeanne Bailey6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Paige Cox
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published
2.81
Lindsey Bowman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Caroline Rose
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Cari Dunham
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Casey Schatzley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.54
Callie Kellums
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.46
Lauren Lance
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Callie Kellums + Cari Dunham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Cox
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Lindsey Bowman
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Caroline Rose
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Cari Dunham
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Casey Schatzley
10W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Callie Kellums
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54
Lauren Lance
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.