Teams

Stevenson/Appleby/Nashville

2023 Combo 40 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Monday AM & PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-18vs Powers/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Stevenson / Elizabeth Ward vs Kathy Wells / Sarah MacIntyre4-6, 3-6
2023-08-28vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Church / Elizabeth Ward vs Beth Gottlieb / Jenny Barnes6-3, 6-0
2023-08-21vs Cowles/Walker/NashvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Denson / Elizabeth Ward vs Susan Welch / Stacey Wood6-2, 6-4
2023-08-14vs Powers/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Suzanne Lawing vs Mindy Higgins / Dina Sjursen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Monday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Whitney Thompson
published
3.20
Katherine Church
published
3.18
Jennie Reese
published
3.15
Bettina Moore
published 3.5
3.11
Desiree Appleby
published 3.5
3.05
3.05
Suzanne Lawing
published
2.95
Elizabeth Ward
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.91
Cindy Denson
published 3
2.88
Brandi White
published 3
Courtney Conklin
published 3
2.74
Maggie Stockton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bettina Moore + Whitney Thompson12752% games+1.3% vs expected
Jennie Reese + Elizabeth Ward044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Thompson
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Katherine Church
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.20
Jennie Reese
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bettina Moore
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Desiree Appleby
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Catherine Williamson
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Suzanne Lawing
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Elizabeth Ward
110W–130L career · 6 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Cindy Denson
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Brandi White
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Courtney Conklin
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maggie Stockton
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.