Teams

McDonald/Nashville

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Mixed -Sunday

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-20vs Berryhill/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKylie Davis / Brian Shubert vs Jon Gugala / Erin Akery7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCrystal Wray / Charles Yeager vs Joel Berryhill / Lindsey Gaither4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrent Jean / Susanna Vaughan vs Stephan Pierenkemper / Saba Chishti6-3, 6-4
2025-06-15vs Berryhill/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Shubert / Crystal Wray vs Joel Berryhill / Saba Chishti3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynelle McDonald / Charles Yeager vs Michelle Salada / Stephan Pierenkemper6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrent Jean / Susanna Vaughan vs Alan Stafford / Noelle Cotey1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed -Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Debra Hutjens
published 4
3.87
Evan Curran
published
3.84
Kylie Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Nick Derenne
published
3.70
Crystal Wray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Charles Yeager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Susanna Vaughan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Brent Jean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Brian Shubert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Anna Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Lynelle McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Jean + Crystal Wray3249% gamesnot enough data
Susanna Vaughan + Brent Jean314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Hutjens
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
Evan Curran
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Kylie Davis
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Nick Derenne
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Crystal Wray
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Charles Yeager
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Susanna Vaughan
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brent Jean
8W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Brian Shubert
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Anna Hall
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Lynelle McDonald
6W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.