Teams

John Tran-YTC-18+-6.5-Combo

2025 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Combo · 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-16vs Henry Huberdeau-YTC-18+-6.5-ComboSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Hester / Chang Hyun Park vs Zach Walsh / Deming Wang3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMark Lovell / Ronnie Forrest vs David McGuirt / Hongbiao Wang6-4, 6-3
2025-09-09vs George Crandell-YTC-18+6.5-ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Cullins / David Hester vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Drew Mauldin6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesScott Cullins / David Hester vs Paul Ohno / Reynolds Parnell6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNathan Maynard / Mark Lovell vs Jeremy Samolesky / Brian Young2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChang Hyun Park / Ronnie Forrest vs Kiedong Lim / Derrick Frazier6-2, 6-3
2025-08-26vs Henry Huberdeau-YTC-18+-6.5-ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesNathan Maynard / Scott Simpson vs Zach Walsh / Lamar Daniels III2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChang Hyun Park / Mark Lovell vs David Welesko / Lamar Daniels3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Cullins / David Hester vs David McGuirt / Hongbiao Wang6-4, 6-1
2025-08-19vs George Crandell-YTC-18+6.5-ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Burroughs / Mark Lovell vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Drew Mauldin3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Tran / David Hester vs Roger Hunt / Grant Kirby6-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesScott Cullins / Mark Lovell vs Jeremy Samolesky / Eric Olsen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNathan Maynard / Scott Simpson vs Kiedong Lim / Reynolds Parnell6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesScott Burroughs / David Hester vs Karl Rayborn / Brian Young3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Scott Cullins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Chang Hyun Park
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.80
Nathan Maynard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Mark Lovell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Ronnie Forrest
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
David Hester
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Scott Burroughs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Hester + Scott Cullins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Cullins
21W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Chang Hyun Park
3W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Maynard
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.80
Mark Lovell
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Ronnie Forrest
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
David Hester
7W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Scott Burroughs
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.