Teams

Alice/META

2025 Tri-Level 18 & over-META · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-26vs Mukherjee/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesAlice Zhang / Liz Guillemette vs Morgan Smith / Sara Wallingford1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Shults-kumar / Rachel Lovelace vs Holli Cox / Emily Jo Doran6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Kirsten Hoskins vs Madga Cox / Lynne Little1-6, 1-6
2025-08-24vs Thacker/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesLiz Guillemette / Analida Alexay vs Taihi Egres / Mary DiSantis6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Shults-kumar / Jane Dean vs Holly Grammer / Shannon Hinkle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Jessica Alzamora vs Brittini Thacker / Barb Janiszewski3-6, 2-6
2025-08-19vs Thacker/METASplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Shults-kumar / Ruth Jackson vs Sarah LaGuardia / Shannon Hinkle6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRachel Lovelace / Kirsten Hoskins vs Anita Jilton / Barb Janiszewski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-17vs Mukherjee/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Zhang / Analida Alexay vs Kim Ewing / Holli Cox5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Lovelace / Mary Warner vs Emily Jo Doran / Jessica Taylor6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary Jo Sparrow / Christina Betancourt vs Lynne Little / Eve Little Bradford2-6, 1-6
2025-08-12vs Mukherjee/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesAlice Zhang / Liz Guillemette vs Morgan Smith / Sara Wallingford2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Jackson / Mary Warner vs Emily Jo Doran / Jessica Taylor6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKirsten Hoskins / Jane Dean vs Keo Jur / Madga Cox0-6, 1-6
2025-08-03vs Thacker/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesLiz Guillemette / Analida Alexay vs Raegan Goodson / Holly Grammer6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKirsten Hoskins / Jane Dean vs Brittini Thacker / Sarah LaGuardia2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Alzamora / Mary Jo Sparrow vs Anita Jilton / Regan Jordan1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Liz Guillemette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Mary Beth Shults-kumar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Alice Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Analida Alexay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.10
Jane Dean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Christina Betancourt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Kirsten Hoskins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Mary Jo Sparrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Lovelace
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ruth Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Dean + Kirsten Hoskins5447% games−8.0% vs expected
Alice Zhang + Analida Alexay224 matchesnot enough data
Liz Guillemette + Analida Alexay314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Guillemette
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Mary Beth Shults-kumar
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.56
4
Alice Zhang
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Analida Alexay
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jane Dean
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Christina Betancourt
5W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Kirsten Hoskins
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Mary Jo Sparrow
0W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Rachel Lovelace
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Jackson
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.