Teams

18 & Over 3.0X Gonzales - VR

2026 USTA Mixed 18 & Over League - NNM · 3.0 Mixed

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-09vs 18 & Over Udell 3.0X - ACCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPreet Shah / Junting Liu-Norrod vs Peter Eicker / Andrea Eicker6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAaron Brundage / Theresa Carvell-Jones vs Shelley Silverman / David Silverman1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Gonzales / Luz Gonzales vs Aubry James / Adam James1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Preet Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Dwight McNeil
published 3
2.81
Tim Hale
published
Elchin Zeynalov
published 3
2.69
Gene Baca
published 3
2.62
Sabina Vitello
published
2.57
Maribel Roybal
published
2.56
Barbara Morck
published 3
2.52
Junting Liu-Norrod
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Aaron Brundage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Angelica Allen
published 2.5
2.16
Theresa Carvell-Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Luz Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Matthews
published
Nancy Matthews
published
Sara Young
published
Sarah Baca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gene Baca + Sarah Baca4944% gamesnot enough data
Jon Matthews + Nancy Matthews1734% gamesnot enough data
Luz Gonzales + Gene Baca033 matchesnot enough data
Luz Gonzales + Elchin Zeynalov033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Preet Shah
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Dwight McNeil
39W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tim Hale
17W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Elchin Zeynalov
5W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Gene Baca
11W–26L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Sabina Vitello
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
Maribel Roybal
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.57
3
Barbara Morck
62W–141L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Junting Liu-Norrod
39W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Aaron Brundage
3W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Angelica Allen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Theresa Carvell-Jones
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Luz Gonzales
42W–128L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jon Matthews
6W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Matthews
34W–78L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Young
11W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Baca
14W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.