Teams

Brownsville William

2026 Valley Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 8.0 Valley Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-20vs Harlingen GavinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Aguilar / William Taliancich vs Jaylynn Sanchez / Matthew Torres6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Padilla / Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa vs Francisco Mendoza / Zaira Martinez-Guillen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRicardo Losoya / Luz Cortes vs Tabitha Torres / Eddie Avitia4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-06vs Harlingen RamiroWon 30
W#1 DoublesJesse Lucio / Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa vs Jacob Leal / Julianne Martinez6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Padilla / Luz Cortes vs Ramiro Gomez / Kayla Garcia6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRicardo Losoya / Gina Crixell vs Ruben Contreras / Jamie Alejandro7-5, 6-3
2026-07-30vs HCC CadeWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Aguilar / William Taliancich vs Carson Wick / Mary Scaief6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEsli Campos / Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa vs Natalie Leal / Dalton Mann6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGuillermo Caracheo / Rachel Kram vs Ruben Garza / Paula Fields4-6, 3-6
2026-07-23vs Harlingen JPWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Taliancich / Monica Aguilar vs Toni Ibarra / Leo Cantu6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGina Crixell / Esli Campos vs Axel Ortiz / Anica Diaz3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLuz Cortes / Guillermo Caracheo vs Ena Capucion / Juan Sauceda6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Valley Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brownsville William4093773
2HCC Cade2284982
3Harlingen Gavin134817120
4Harlingen Ramiro0421021141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
William Taliancich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Monica Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Esli Campos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.79
Guillermo Caracheo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Jesse Lucio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Erika Lucio
published 4
3.74
Ricardo Losoya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Luz Cortes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Rachel Kram
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Michael Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Gina Crixell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa + Guillermo Caracheo314 matchesnot enough data
Erika Lucio + Jesse Lucio224 matchesnot enough data
William Taliancich + Monica Aguilar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Taliancich
35W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Monica Aguilar
38W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Esli Campos
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa
35W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Guillermo Caracheo
21W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Jesse Lucio
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Erika Lucio
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricardo Losoya
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Luz Cortes
23W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Rachel Kram
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Michael Padilla
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Gina Crixell
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.