Teams

Everling

2023 Loudoun Adult Other Winter Weekday Doubles Women · Loudoun Adult Other Weekday Doubles 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-28vs Bixler/ GoodwinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacy Everling / Janet Rogers vs Chandra Bittner / Deja O'Malley1-6, 1-6
2023-03-17vs JobeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacy Everling / Jill Vaughan vs Tosha Clark / Joy Moynihan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-03-09vs Barnet/ ChestnutLost 02
L#2 DoublesJacy Everling / Johnna Loftis vs Joy Catania Truitt / Stefany Glessner3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSara Marlin / Vanessa Moore vs Linda Chestnut / Susie Marentis4-6, 4-6
2023-02-28vs Bixler/ GoodwinLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Marlin / Melinda McGowan vs Melissa Whiteley / Christy Bixler4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJacy Everling / Janet Rogers vs Aubrey Goodwin / Sandra Kim1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-20vs JobeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacy Everling / Jill Vaughan vs Joy Moynihan / Sandra Moses2-6, 2-6
2023-02-09vs Barnet/ ChestnutWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Marlin / KERSTIN DEMKO vs Maryam Aranee / Alexandra Robinson6-2, 5-3
2023-01-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJacy Everling / Melinda McGowan vs Susie Marentis / Sara Overman3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult Other Weekday Doubles 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jill Vaughan
published
2.69
KERSTIN DEMKO
published
2.54
Jacy Everling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Sara Marlin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.09
Melinda McGowan
published
2.09
Vanessa Moore
published
Heather Molloy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Marlin + Jacy Everling61645% games−5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Vaughan
22W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
KERSTIN DEMKO
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Jacy Everling
44W–87L career · 6 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Sara Marlin
43W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.52
Melinda McGowan
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Vanessa Moore
9W–23L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Heather Molloy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.