Teams

MGentry

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesDan Rea / Robert Caulfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-29vs Gchristopher40Won 20
W#1 DoublesJason McGeorge / Kevin Hampton vs James Mellott / Matthew Fitzsimmons6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBen Micham / Michael Gee vs Jairo Pacheco / Mark Unruh4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-22vs LWilliams40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesAP Blake / John Nani vs West Ludwig / Bobby Hammond1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJason McGeorge / Dan Rea vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-15vs RElliottLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Caulfield / Michael Gee vs Sean Krause / Matthew Pare4-6, 2-6
2022-09-08vs BRoss/BTownsend 6.5 ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Caulfield / Michael Gee vs Steve Crell / Jason Hill2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Hampton / AP Blake vs Patrick Graney / Rob Sellick4-6, 3-6
2022-09-01vs PGugliottaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Hampton / Jason McGeorge vs Gregory Beyer / Chun Lav6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Campbell / AP Blake vs Darian Spell / Mitchell Wolborsky4-6, 3-6
2022-08-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Carrigan / AP Blake vs John Rhoades / Robert Moore6-3, 6-4
2022-08-18vs TLaughery NRCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Gentry / Jason McGeorge vs Tom Laughery / Mark Zurawel6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohn Nani / Michael Gee vs Rick Booth / David Hancock4-3
2022-08-11vs Gchristopher40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Campbell / Dan Rea vs Matthew Fitzsimmons / Jairo Pacheco2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Carrigan / AP Blake vs Greg Christopher / Mark Unruh6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jason McGeorge
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Robert Caulfield
published
3.17
Michael Campbell
published
3.12
Ben Micham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
2.85
Mark Gentry
published
2.77
Michael Gee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
AP Blake
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.46
Eddie King
published 2.5
2.37
Dan Rea
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Philip Apostolico
published
Marty Kocurek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Rea + Jason McGeorge314 matchesnot enough data
Dan Rea + AP Blake213 matchesnot enough data
Dan Rea + Michael Gee123 matchesnot enough data
Ben Micham + Jason McGeorge303 matchesnot enough data
AP Blake + Eddie King123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jason McGeorge
185W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Robert Caulfield
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Michael Campbell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ben Micham
72W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christopher Carrigan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.02
Mark Gentry
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Michael Gee
59W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
AP Blake
31W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
2.5
Eddie King
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
0%61%39%
2.46
3
Dan Rea
36W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.37
Philip Apostolico
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36
Marty Kocurek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.