Teams

Laura Beth Jones-YTC-Thursday-FLEX

2025 Auburn Flex League Fall · Thursday Night FLEX - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesMadison Piedra / Jennifer Milton vs Annie Kirby / Kate Wu2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Deist / Madison Coleman vs Isabella Fiorenzo / Jennifer Stephens7-5, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMallory Waller / Loren Brown vs Patricia Stevenson / Laura Schmitt2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMadison Piedra / Rena Lim Scofield vs Cayton Walker / Rylee Lusich6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMadison Coleman / Cece Fraunfelter vs Kate Wu / Annie Kirby4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesLoren Brown / Rena Lim Scofield vs Patricia Stevenson / Laura Schmitt2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCece Fraunfelter / Jennifer Milton vs Cayton Walker / Annie Kirby6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMadison Coleman / Paula Deist vs Kate Wu / Margaret Williamson6-7, 1-6
L#4 DoublesCharlotte Forrest / Christine Chung vs Jeanette Hart / Megan Corcoran1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRena Lim Scofield / Mallory Waller vs Laura Schmitt / Patricia Stevenson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLoren Brown / Madison Piedra vs Cayton Walker / Rylee Lusich7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Deist / Cece Fraunfelter vs Jennifer Stephens / Annie Kirby6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRena Lim Scofield / Jennifer Milton vs Jennifer Stephens / Kate Wu6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaula Deist / Cece Fraunfelter vs Cayton Walker / Rylee Lusich6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Thursday Night FLEX - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Rena Lim Scofield
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Madison Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Cece Fraunfelter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Christine Chung
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Jennifer Milton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Laura Beth Jones
published
2.34
Charlotte Forrest
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Madison Piedra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mallory Waller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Deist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rena Lim Scofield
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Madison Coleman
22W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
3
Cece Fraunfelter
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Chung
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Milton
41W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Laura Beth Jones
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
3
Charlotte Forrest
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
Madison Piedra
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Waller
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Deist
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.