Teams

LMBR-Bruce/Peninsula

2025 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-05vs LJFI-FINKE-NYQUIST/NMP 55+ 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Siebold / Maryann Bruce vs Katherine Dugan / Cindy Houser6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Ray / Lois Reynolds vs Liz Barton / Suzanne Davis1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLin Altamura / Debbie Beam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-15vs LKWI-Williams/Cabarrus CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Beam / Karen Ray vs Odette Baker / Diane Davis5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Siebold / Keryn Rush vs Leta Wiley / Shumbriar Ostapko2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLouise Brown / Sharon Cantey vs Patty Smith / Jane Rodewald3-6, 1-6
2025-04-14vs LBKO-Kosior/EdgemoorLost 03
L#1 DoublesLin Altamura / Maryann Bruce vs Linda Dove / Annie Edenfield3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Beam / Karen Ray vs Kim Molke / Elana Fedor1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAntoinette Jones / Lois Reynolds vs Teresa Pal / Stephanie Stockley1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-05vs LVWE-Weber/Westport 55+ 4.0 MonLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Foreman / Nancy Zylstra vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Shaun Simmer4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKira Skill / Antoinette Jones vs Becky Heflin / Deirdre Bolter4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaryann Bruce / Mary Jones vs Helen Bugg / Leslie Gimbel6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-24vs LJFI-FINKE-NYQUIST/NMP 55+ 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesMaryann Bruce / Elizabeth Foreman vs Kathryn Burdick / Heidi Nyquist6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAntoinette Jones / Sharon Cantey vs Jill Sullivan-Keating / Katherine Dugan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-23vs LKED-Edge /RRLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Zylstra / Elizabeth Foreman vs Kimberly Robbins / Christina Tarry1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaryann Bruce / Lin Altamura vs Cindy Aprile / Sharon Kerns4-6, 5-7
2025-03-17vs LDUP-Upchurch/LNRSCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKira Skill / Louise Brown vs Donna Upchurch / Amy Brandon2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaryann Bruce / Lin Altamura vs Alva Bates / Nancy Thompson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Jones / Karen Ray vs Lisa Zeitz / Janet Marek7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-24vs LBKO-Kosior/EdgemoorWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Foreman / Nancy Zylstra vs Kim Molke / Elizabeth Holum6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKira Skill / Louise Brown vs SHARON WELLS / Erika Buchholz7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Siebold / Antoinette Jones vs Filomena Ferri / Tracey McKenna7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
3.65
Kira Skill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Lin Altamura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Antoinette Jones
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.55
Alison Siebold
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Nancy Zylstra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Keryn Rush
published
3.50
Maryann Bruce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Lois Reynolds
published
3.32
Karen Ray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Sharon Cantey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Louise Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kira Skill + Antoinette Jones2351% games+2.2% vs expected
Maryann Bruce + Lin Altamura121450% games−0.0% vs expected
Kira Skill + Nancy Zylstra111150% games−0.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Foreman + Nancy Zylstra1644% games−9.3% vs expected
Kira Skill + Maryann Bruce2540% games−13.3% vs expected
Karen Ray + Sharon Cantey0632% gamesnot enough data
Kira Skill + Karen Ray1448% gamesnot enough data
Kira Skill + Sharon Cantey2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Foreman
32W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Kira Skill
156W–160L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Lin Altamura
68W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Antoinette Jones
33W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Alison Siebold
71W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Nancy Zylstra
76W–139L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Keryn Rush
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Maryann Bruce
65W–94L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Lois Reynolds
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Karen Ray
105W–158L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Sharon Cantey
31W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Louise Brown
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.