Teams

CThilo (Pine Lake)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-02vs SConnor (Providence County Club)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Brightwell / Jan Puckett vs Jan Aspey / Rebecca Shore6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-25vs JLayne/NChristensen (Southampton)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Surrett / Jan Puckett vs W Kay Bridges / Cindy Wilson6-7, 2-6
2023-09-04vs SMyers (PPRSC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Brightwell / Karen Holbrook vs Pat Williams / Diane Smith2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Surrett / Lauren Stikeleather vs Kathleen Goessel / Susan Grills6-1, 6-1
2023-08-28vs TAmos/TLoughlin-Young (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Brightwell / Jan Puckett vs Terri Setzer / Rhonda Tate6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Surrett / Lauren Stikeleather vs Jane Neese / Jeri Zangmeister7-5, 6-4
2023-08-14vs SConnor (Providence County Club)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Brightwell / Lori Jones vs Pam Richardson / Lisa Duggins7-6, 6-1
2023-08-07vs JLayne/NChristensen (Southampton)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Surrett / Gayle Hoy vs Lisa O'Shea / Nancy Christensen0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Susan Brightwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Rene Griffin
published
2.84
Jan Puckett
published
Sharon Surrett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Cyndi Thilo
published 3
2.64
Gayle Hoy
published
2.40
Karen Holbrook
published
Lauren Stikeleather
published
Rebekah Garagiola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Surrett + Susan Brightwell123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Holbrook + Gayle Hoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susan Brightwell
29W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Rene Griffin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.89
Jan Puckett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Sharon Surrett
20W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cyndi Thilo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Gayle Hoy
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Karen Holbrook
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.40
Lauren Stikeleather
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebekah Garagiola
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.