Teams

Adams/Knoxville

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-14vs Lewis/KnoxvilleLost 13
W#1 DoublesStacy McIntosh / Elsa Roland vs Meka Barry / Joanne Latimer7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesIrene Shivers vs Michelle Corley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSue Mather / Brooke Wilson vs Lora Boruff / Karen Bell3-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesAnn Wegner / Nicole Haas vs Gloria Palacios / Rose Perkinson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-24vs Lewis/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Sills / Joy Ruble vs Pomy Lewis / Maggie Reynolds2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIrene Shivers vs Lake Bailey0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacy McIntosh / Leigh M Krieps vs Michelle Corley / Lora Boruff6-1, 6-0
L#4 DoublesElsa Roland / Laura Miller vs Karen Bell / Mitzi Bodie6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Stacy McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Stefanie Adams
published
2.88
Elsa Roland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Leigh M Krieps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Rebecca Bender
published
2.58
Sue Mather
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Michelle Sills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Nicole Haas
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Irene Shivers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Ann Wegner
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Chasity O'Quinn
published 2.5
Joy Ruble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsa Roland + Rebecca Bender8071% games+14.4% vs expected
Stefanie Adams + Stacy McIntosh4171% gamesnot enough data
Chasity O'Quinn + Nicole Haas033 matchesnot enough data
Stacy McIntosh + Elsa Roland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy McIntosh
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Stefanie Adams
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Elsa Roland
51W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Leigh M Krieps
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Rebecca Bender
28W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Sue Mather
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Michelle Sills
1W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.42
Nicole Haas
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.37
2.5
Irene Shivers
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ann Wegner
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Chasity O'Quinn
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Joy Ruble
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.