Teams

RCC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-21vs BRMST GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Baesler / Sarah Latham vs Taylor Evans / Marlene Evans6-4, 6-0
2024-08-14vs CVTA PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandy Sutton / Sarah Latham vs Peyton Anton / Erin Buchanan4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Johs / Jessica Bruny vs Amie Elcan / Sharvari Chougule7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-07vs RMTC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesLesley Johs / Jessica Bruny vs Kitty Shepherd / Grace Graham6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2024-07-31vs NJ PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Richards / Jessica Bruny vs Lindsay Thompson / Heather Roberts6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeather Huelsman / Lesley Johs vs Liz Mercado / Adrienne Beall5-7, 4-6
2024-07-24vs LAC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Wang / Sarah Latham vs Jody Manning / Amy Grolnick6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sarah Latham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Jenna Baesler
published 3.5
3.22
Lauren Richards
published
2.86
Tabitha Bartel
published 3
2.78
Sara Wang
published
2.51
Lesley Johs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Jessica Bruny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Mandy Sutton
published
2.28
Holly Little
published
Amanda Sarti
published 2.5
2.22
Heather Huelsman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Richards + Jenna Baesler11172% games+12.0% vs expected
Tabitha Bartel + Jenna Baesler5456% games+8.8% vs expected
Jessica Bruny + Lesley Johs15655% games+5.7% vs expected
Tabitha Bartel + Lauren Richards303 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Sutton + Holly Little213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Latham
68W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Jenna Baesler
65W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Lauren Richards
25W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Tabitha Bartel
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sara Wang
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lesley Johs
37W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Jessica Bruny
33W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
Holly Little
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Amanda Sarti
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Heather Huelsman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.