Teams

CVTA BLUE

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

4 players · average NTRP 4.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-10vs MC SILVERSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Chris Whipple / Keah Kalantari6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 Male SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Kevin Hahn6-2, 6-4
2025-07-03vs TTA PURPLEWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Craig Hoeltgen vs George Burton / Brandt Theander6-2, 6-3
W#1 Male SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Ryan Pelton6-1, 6-1
2025-06-26vs GAC NAVYWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Matthew Warnicke / Jacob Toffler3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 Male SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Trenton Steese7-5, 6-0
2025-06-19vs MC SILVERWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Connor Ohlsen vs Kevin Hahn / Ben Parkhurst6-4, 6-3
2025-06-16vs GAC NAVYWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Rene del Barco / Ryan Beckstrom7-5, 6-4
W#1 Male SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Jacob Toffler6-3, 6-4
2025-06-12vs TTA PURPLEWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Brandt Theander / Ryan Pelton5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 4.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CVTA BLUE601627109
2MC SILVER4214412128
3GAC NAVY1541429185
4TTA PURPLE1521632196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Connor Ohlsen
usually #1 Male Singles 40%, also #2 Male Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
published 4.5
4.40
Connor Buchanan
published 5
4.33
Brandon Jacquez
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connor Ohlsen + Craig Hoeltgen5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
29W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.43
5
Connor Buchanan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Brandon Jacquez
63W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.