Teams

AMcMillen55+

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-18vs RRubin/LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesGregory Kash / John Perry vs Michael Marchi / Julian Barnes3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJames King / Allen McMillen vs Robert Kent / Richard Rubin1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-04vs Diamonds 7.5 comboWon 10
W#1 DoublesGregory Kash / John Perry vs Scott Riley / Vincent Conzola6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-27vs McNeillLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames King / Allen McMillen vs Larry Essary / Mark Zimmerman5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-09-20vs JParhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames King / Allen McMillen vs McNair Bell / Ken Dehaven3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-13vs RRubin/LeeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGregory Kash / John Perry vs Kurt Ihly / Roger Hatlen2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJames King / Allen McMillen vs Michael Marchi / Rod Boyle6-1, 6-4
2022-08-23vs McNeillWon 10
W#1 DoublesBill Francis / John Perry vs David McNeill / Mark Zimmerman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-16vs JParhamWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames King / Allen McMillen vs Ken Dehaven / Dragan Jagnjic6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Bill Francis
published 4
3.61
Khalid Mustafa
published
3.54
Gregory Kash
published 4
3.20
3.18
Peter Williams
published
3.17
Chip Payne
published 3.5
3.15
John Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Bart White
published 3.5
3.01
Allen McMillen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Keith Satisky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allen McMillen + John Perry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Francis
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Khalid Mustafa
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Gregory Kash
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Reginald B Gillespie Jr
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Peter Williams
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Chip Payne
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
John Perry
69W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Bart White
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Allen McMillen
47W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Keith Satisky
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.